How to write a literature review for a dissertation
It is important that your research fits logically within the existing research in your area, and you may have found an ideal study to link with and to extend in some way. Original research in the sciences is harder to parse; however, a sciences study can often be piggybacked on existing research if there are unknowns at the end of previous studies. It can also establish a framework within which to present and analyse the findings. The recommendations for future research at the end of a dissertation are a good place to find a subject that remains to be studied. Sometimes even a key idea can be discovered in this way. Are the parameters of the review reasonable.
Keeping a record of your search strategy is useful, to prevent you duplicating effort by doing the same search twice, or missing out a significant and relevant sector of literature because you think you have already done that search. To some extent, particularly with postgraduate research, the literature review can become a project in itself. You first need to decide what you need to read. How To Write A Literature Review For Your Dissertation 1. Sometimes even a key idea can be discovered in this way. If very little literature exists, the wise student will write, in effect, a several-paragraph book report by citing the purpose of the study, the methodology, the findings, and the conclusions.
Selection of Sources
Have you indicated the purpose of the review. With dissertations, and particularly theses, it will be more down to you to decide. Literature review is the dissertation supervisor and other. Critical Evaluation of the Literature
Have you organised your material according to issues. Research tells a story and the existing literature helps us identify where we are in the story currently.
What is a review of literature. You can find the contact details for the Information Librarian for your own area via the Library web pages. All of the teaching staff was impressed after reading it. Writing the introduction; Writing the body; Writing the conclusion; What is a review of. The focus of the Study Guide is the literature review within a dissertation.
How To Write A Literature Review For Your Dissertation 1. A review is a required part of grant and research proposals and often a chapter in theses and dissertations. They will want to know how you went about looking for relevant material, and your process of selection and omission. Original research in the sciences is harder to parse; however, a sciences study can often be piggybacked on existing research if there are unknowns at the end of previous studies.
Thank you so much as my paper was accepted right away. ” A Summary, the final main section, introduces the next chapter. Selection of Sources
Have you indicated the purpose of the review. Sometimes even a key idea can be discovered in this way. Once you are part way through your reading you can have a go at writing the literature review, in anticipation of revising it later on.
No electronic literature search can be 100% comprehensive, as the match between search terms and the content of articles will never be perfect. • to define and limit the problem you are working on
• to place your study in an historical perspective
• to avoid unnecessary duplication
• to evaluate promising research methods
• to relate your findings to previous knowledge and suggest further research. This can be particularly useful if you find a review article that evaluates other literature in the field. You may also want to make a clear decision about whether to start with a very narrow focus and work outwards, or to start wide before focussing in. When to review the literature. Both of these are important and need to be critically reviewed.
For example, a study of the performance of a clinical team working in gerontology might involve reading literature within medicine; nursing; other allied healthcare specialties; psychology; and sociology; as well as perhaps healthcare policy; and patients’ experiences of healthcare. This is the best solution for academic level papers like mine. It is written for knowledgeable peers from easily retrievable sources of the most recent issue possible. The purposes of the review are:. Beware of becoming too attached to your writing.
Also popular information:
- Where to buy essay online?
This can mean that you get mixed up over what is an exact quote, and what you have written in your own words; or over what was an idea of your own that you jotted down, or an idea from some text. No electronic literature search can be 100% comprehensive, as the match between search terms and the content of articles will never be perfect. Often, the literature review will end with a statement of the research question(s). A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review. • to define and limit the problem you are working on
• to place your study in an historical perspective
• to avoid unnecessary duplication
• to evaluate promising research methods
• to relate your findings to previous knowledge and suggest further research. When introducing someone’s opinion, don’t use “says”, but instead an appropriate verb which more accurately reflects this viewpoint, such as “argues”, “claims” or “states”.Present terminology and viewpoints on the topic in an unbiased and comprehensive manner
The process of conducting and reporting your literature review can help you clarify your own thoughts about your study. It is important to keep the focus on your study, rather than on the literature (Wellington 2005). Original research in the sciences is harder to parse; however, a sciences study can often be piggybacked on existing research if there are unknowns at the end of previous studies. Learn how to write a literature review for your thesis or dissertation. An electronic search may throw up a huge number of hits, but there are still likely to be other relevant articles that it has not detected. Every research study that is mentioned should in some way bear upon the gap in the knowledge, and each study that is mentioned should end with the comment that the study did not collect data about the specific gap in the knowledge of the study as outlined in Chapter 1.
